On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:25:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > To rename __this_cpu to raw_cpu; it would then need a little manual
> > fixup and generic __this_cpu -> raW_cpu map, which can add the
> > preemption check.
>
> Something like so perhaps... only lightly compile tested
> (x86_64-defconfig).
First portion looks good to me on first glance.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> index 8729723..95e3532 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> @@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count);
> */
> static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
> {
> - return __this_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
> + return raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
> }
>
> static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
> {
> - __this_cpu_write_4(__preempt_count, pc);
> + raw_cpu_write_4(__preempt_count, pc);
> }
Huh? What happened here? Why do we use the __this_cpu_read_4 here?
This should be just raw_cpu_write()
And more following
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/percpu.h b/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
> index d17784e..b5aca54 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/percpu.h
> @@ -56,17 +56,18 @@ extern unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
> #define per_cpu(var, cpu) \
> (*SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR(&(var), per_cpu_offset(cpu)))
>
> -#ifndef __this_cpu_ptr
> -#define __this_cpu_ptr(ptr) SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR(ptr, __my_cpu_offset)
> +#ifndef raw_cpu_ptr
> +#define raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR(ptr, __my_cpu_offset)
> #endif
Got another patch here that gets rid of __this_cpu_ptr and uses
raw_cpu_ptr everywhere instead. Would be good to make this all symmetric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
