On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:11:53 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Anyway; I don't think the spinlock pattern matches too good and I don't > mind the proposed: > > this_cpu_$op (disables IRQs itself) > __this_cpu_$op (with preemption check) > raw_cpu_$op (without preemption check) > That sounds fine too. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
