On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:22:12PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> > index 8729723..95e3532 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> > @@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count);
> > */
> > static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
> > {
> > - return __this_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
> > + return raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
> > }
> >
> > static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
> > {
> > - __this_cpu_write_4(__preempt_count, pc);
> > + raw_cpu_write_4(__preempt_count, pc);
> > }
>
> Huh? What happened here? Why do we use the __this_cpu_read_4 here?
> This should be just raw_cpu_write()
Header inclusion hell; I could only easily get away with including
asm/percpu.h, so I had to use the _4 stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
