On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The CLFLUSH is done afterwards (making it a use-once thing), so WB
> might still be faster and would avoid the PAT headache ...
Absolutely, that's why there's no need for a WT buffer at all, methinks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
