On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:26:28PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 04:37 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:31:20AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:23 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > > An untested patch that gets rid of the RCU_SOFTIRQs in this case is
> > > > below.
> > >
> > > Yup, toasted.
> >
> > You lost me on this one. If my patch broke your system, any chance of
> > any diagnostic information?
>
> No no, the RCU_SOFTIRQs are toast, history, gone.
Ah, I do like that outcome much better! ;-) The scheduling-clock
interrupts are gone (or at least reduced) as well?
And does this mean that I can have your Tested-by?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
