On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 15:29 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 06:03:31AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:26:28PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 04:37 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:31:20AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:23 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > An untested patch that gets rid of the RCU_SOFTIRQs in this case is > > > > > > below. > > > > > > > > > > Yup, toasted. > > > > > > > > You lost me on this one. If my patch broke your system, any chance of > > > > any diagnostic information? > > > > > > No no, the RCU_SOFTIRQs are toast, history, gone. > > > > Ah, I do like that outcome much better! ;-) The scheduling-clock > > interrupts are gone (or at least reduced) as well? > > > > And does this mean that I can have your Tested-by? > > What's wrong with Toasted-by: ? ;)
It sprang to mind, but I resisted :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
