There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially
as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well.

Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com>
Cc: Mohit Kumar <mohit.ku...@st.com>
Cc: pci <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: tip/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
+++ tip/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
@@ -294,14 +294,12 @@ no_valid_irq:
 static void clear_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
        unsigned int pos, nvec;
-       struct irq_desc *desc;
        struct msi_desc *msi;
        struct pcie_port *pp;
        struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
 
        /* get the port structure */
-       desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
-       msi = irq_desc_get_msi_desc(desc);
+       msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
        pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
        if (!pp) {
                BUG();


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to