On 02/24/2014 03:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 01:19:15PM +0800, Michael wang wrote: >> Peter, do we accidentally missed this commit? >> >> http://git.kernel.org/tip/477af336ba06ef4c32e97892bb0d2027ce30f466 > > Ingo dropped it on Saturday because it makes locking_selftest() unhappy. > > That is because we call locking_selftest() way before we're ready to > call schedule() and guess what it does :-/ > > I'm not entirely sure what to do.. ideally I'd shoot locking_selftest in > the head, but clearly that's not entirely desired either.
...what about move idle_balance() back to it's old position? pull_rt_task() logical could be after idle_balance() if still no FAIR and DL, then go into the pick loop, that may could make things more clean & clear, should we have a try? Regards, Michael Wang > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/