On 02/25/2014 06:49 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:47:01PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
>> On 02/24/2014 09:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 01:12:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> + if (p) {
>>>> + if (unlikely(p == RETRY_TASK))
>>>> + goto again;
>>>
>>> We could even make that: unlikely(p & 1), I think most CPUs can encode
>>> that far better than the full pointer immediate.
>>
>> Agree, unless odd-align stuff appeared...
>
> That shouldn't happen; we rely on u32 alignment all over the place. So
> for general objects we should have at least the lower two bits free to
> play with.
Make sense :)
Regards,
Michael Wang
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
