----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Rostedt" <[email protected]> > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Ingo > Molnar" <[email protected]>, "Thomas > Gleixner" <[email protected]>, "Rusty Russell" <[email protected]>, > "David Howells" <[email protected]>, > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:54:54 AM > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > [...]
(keeping discussion for later, as I'm busy at a client site) > For now, I'm going to push this in, and also mark it for stable. Which patch or patches do you plan to pull, and which is marked for stable ? This thread is a RFC PATCH. I posted a separate more complete patch in a separate thread marked [PATCH]. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
