On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steven Rostedt" <[email protected]> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Ingo > > Molnar" <[email protected]>, "Thomas > > Gleixner" <[email protected]>, "Rusty Russell" <[email protected]>, > > "David Howells" <[email protected]>, > > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:54:54 AM > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new > > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > > > [...] > > (keeping discussion for later, as I'm busy at a client site) > > > For now, I'm going to push this in, and also mark it for stable. > > Which patch or patches do you plan to pull, and which is marked for stable ? The one that I replied to. I can't pull the module patch unless I get an ack from Rusty. > > This thread is a RFC PATCH. I posted a separate more complete patch in > a separate thread marked [PATCH]. Yeah, I'll post it out soon enough. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
