On Mar 05, Sebastian Capella wrote: [..] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig > index 1f8fed9..83707702 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig > @@ -611,6 +611,11 @@ config CPU_USE_DOMAINS > config IO_36 > bool > > +config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE > + bool > + depends on MMU > + default y if CPU_ARM920T || CPU_ARM926T || CPU_SA1100 || CPU_XSCALE || > CPU_XSC3 || CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 > + > comment "Processor Features" >
Is there any reason why CPU_FEROCEON is not listed here? FWIW, I've just built (but not really tested) a Kirkwood kernel with CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y. And is there any reason to put this config in arch/arm/mm/Kconfig, instead of in arch/arm/Kconfig, below ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE? I'm also puzzled about having two separate options for suspend and hibernate, maybe someone can explain me why a given CPU would support the former but not the latter? Thanks! -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
