On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:29:04 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > [2] "A special case can occur if an SMI handler nests inside an NMI > > handler and then another NMI occurs. During NMI interrupt > > handling, NMI interrupts are disabled, so normally NMI interrupts > > are serviced and completed with an IRET instruction one at a > > time. When the processor enters SMM while executing an NMI > > handler, the processor saves the SMRAM state save map but does > > not save the attribute to keep NMI interrupts disabled. > > Potentially, an NMI could be latched (while in SMM or upon exit) > > and serviced upon exit of SMM even though the previous NMI > > handler has still not completed." > > I believe [2] only applies if there is an IRET executing inside the SMM > handler, which should not normally be the case. It might also have been > addressed since that was written, but I don't know. Bad behaving BIOS? But I'm sure there's no such thing ;-) -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
