On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 15:49 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: > On 10/06/14 15:45, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 11:48 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: > >> Hi Mimi, > >> > >> As you asked ofline , here is possible equivalent and simpler alternative > >> patches not requiring to have additional keyring. > > Please indicate which branch these patches apply to. > > > > thanks, > > > > Mimi > > > > > > on the top of your tree #next-trusted-keys-experimental, excluding 1/4 > patch, which is yours. > I included it by mistake because patches were on the top of that and I > used HEAD~3 instead of HEAD~2 to send them...
This patch set removes the separate 'owner' trusted keyring. Please rebase your patches without the HEAD patch - "f5b4ced KEYS: define an owner trusted keyring" and re-post. thanks, Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
