On 2 Sep 2014, at 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >> index 4b959e6..423707c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ >> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h> >> >> #include <asm/cputype.h> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_FIQ >> +#include <asm/fiq.h> >> +#endif > > Is there much advantage to this ifdef over providing a dummy asm/fiq.h > in ARM64?
While it’s unlikely we’ll use FIQs on arm64 (they are generally reserved for the secure world/firmware), I don’t mind an empty asm/fiq.h file. Catalin-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
