On 02/09/14 22:36, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 2 Sep 2014, at 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> > wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >>> index 4b959e6..423707c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c >>> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ >>> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h> >>> >>> #include <asm/cputype.h> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FIQ >>> +#include <asm/fiq.h> >>> +#endif >> >> Is there much advantage to this ifdef over providing a dummy asm/fiq.h >> in ARM64? > > While it’s unlikely we’ll use FIQs on arm64 (they are generally > reserved for the secure world/firmware), I don’t mind an empty > asm/fiq.h file.
Thanks Catalin, Thanks Russell. I will do this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
