On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 at 03:26:49 AM, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo) wrote:
[...]

> -                     dev_warn(dev, "found %s, expected %s\n",
> -                              jid->name, id->name);
> -                     id = jid;
> -                     info = (void *)jid->driver_data;
> +                     struct flash_info *tmpinfo;
> +
> +                     tmpinfo = (void *)jid->driver_data;
> +                     if (tmpinfo->jedec_id != info->jedec_id ||
> +                                     (info->ext_id != 0 &&
> +                                      tmpinfo->ext_id != info->ext_id)) {
> +                             dev_warn(dev, "found %s, expected %s\n",
> +                                             jid->name, id->name);
> +                             id = jid;
> +                             info = (void *)jid->driver_data;
> +                     }

Won't $info contain an undefined value in case the newly added condition isn't 
met ? The old code initialized $info to a certain value always, the new code 
does not do that.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to