On 16 October 2014 10:00, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo) <bean...@micron.com> wrote: >>There are a lot of changes happening/requested around this code. I also >>proposed some patch touching this code, see >>https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/377917/ > >>Right now there is a slow ongoing work on fixing some m25p80 regression, >>which also may touch the code you change. So I'll suggest postponing this >>patch until we get a regression fixed and then work on this hacky code again. > > > Thanks for your concerns.But for the same deivce id with the different > extended id and > the same device name with the different device id issue, in your patch,this > doesn't take > into account. I have encountered this situation. for example:
I really wasn't looking into details yet and I'm aware my patch does something else. I just say we should first fix the regression and then base next patches on top of that regression fix. I'm not NACKing your changes :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
