On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net> wrote: > > And [get/put]_futex_keys() shouldn't even be called for private futexes. > The following patch had some very minor testing on a 60 core box last > night, but passes both Darren's and perf's tests. So I *think* this is > right, but lack of sleep and I overall just don't trust them futexes!
Hmm. I don't see the advantage of making the code more complex in order to avoid the functions that are no-ops for the !fshared case? IOW, as far as I can tell, this patch doesn't actually really *change* anything. Am I missing something? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/