On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 09:27:15 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> as per 0c740d0afc3b (introduce for_each_thread() to replace the buggy
> while_each_thread()) get rid of do_each_thread { } while_each_thread()
> construct and replace it by a more error prone for_each_thread.
> 
> This patch doesn't introduce any user visible change.
> 
> Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

ACK

Or do you want me to handle this series?

> ---
>  kernel/power/process.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index a397fa161d11..7fd7b72554fe 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
>       while (true) {
>               todo = 0;
>               read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -             do_each_thread(g, p) {
> +             for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>                       if (p == current || !freeze_task(p))
>                               continue;
>  
>                       if (!freezer_should_skip(p))
>                               todo++;
> -             } while_each_thread(g, p);
> +             }
>               read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>  
>               if (!user_only) {
> @@ -93,11 +93,11 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
>  
>               if (!wakeup) {
>                       read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -                     do_each_thread(g, p) {
> +                     for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>                               if (p != current && !freezer_should_skip(p)
>                                   && freezing(p) && !frozen(p))
>                                       sched_show_task(p);
> -                     } while_each_thread(g, p);
> +                     }
>                       read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>               }
>       } else {
> @@ -219,11 +219,11 @@ void thaw_processes(void)
>       thaw_workqueues();
>  
>       read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -     do_each_thread(g, p) {
> +     for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>               /* No other threads should have PF_SUSPEND_TASK set */
>               WARN_ON((p != curr) && (p->flags & PF_SUSPEND_TASK));
>               __thaw_task(p);
> -     } while_each_thread(g, p);
> +     }
>       read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>  
>       WARN_ON(!(curr->flags & PF_SUSPEND_TASK));
> @@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ void thaw_kernel_threads(void)
>       thaw_workqueues();
>  
>       read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -     do_each_thread(g, p) {
> +     for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>               if (p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_WQ_WORKER))
>                       __thaw_task(p);
> -     } while_each_thread(g, p);
> +     }
>       read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>  
>       schedule();
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to