On Tue 21-10-14 14:10:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 09:27:15 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > as per 0c740d0afc3b (introduce for_each_thread() to replace the buggy
> > while_each_thread()) get rid of do_each_thread { } while_each_thread()
> > construct and replace it by a more error prone for_each_thread.
> > 
> > This patch doesn't introduce any user visible change.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
> 
> ACK
> 
> Or do you want me to handle this series?

I don't know, I hoped either you or Andrew to pick it up.

> > ---
> >  kernel/power/process.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> > index a397fa161d11..7fd7b72554fe 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> > @@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
> >     while (true) {
> >             todo = 0;
> >             read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -           do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +           for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >                     if (p == current || !freeze_task(p))
> >                             continue;
> >  
> >                     if (!freezer_should_skip(p))
> >                             todo++;
> > -           } while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +           }
> >             read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >  
> >             if (!user_only) {
> > @@ -93,11 +93,11 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
> >  
> >             if (!wakeup) {
> >                     read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -                   do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +                   for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >                             if (p != current && !freezer_should_skip(p)
> >                                 && freezing(p) && !frozen(p))
> >                                     sched_show_task(p);
> > -                   } while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +                   }
> >                     read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >             }
> >     } else {
> > @@ -219,11 +219,11 @@ void thaw_processes(void)
> >     thaw_workqueues();
> >  
> >     read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -   do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +   for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >             /* No other threads should have PF_SUSPEND_TASK set */
> >             WARN_ON((p != curr) && (p->flags & PF_SUSPEND_TASK));
> >             __thaw_task(p);
> > -   } while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +   }
> >     read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >  
> >     WARN_ON(!(curr->flags & PF_SUSPEND_TASK));
> > @@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ void thaw_kernel_threads(void)
> >     thaw_workqueues();
> >  
> >     read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > -   do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > +   for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> >             if (p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_WQ_WORKER))
> >                     __thaw_task(p);
> > -   } while_each_thread(g, p);
> > +   }
> >     read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >  
> >     schedule();
> > 
> 
> -- 
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to