On 01/11/2015 12:40 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The current code uses setup_irq, while it could perfectly use the much simpler
request_irq. Switch to that.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
---
drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
index 02268448dc85..738853873a3b 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c
@@ -130,13 +130,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sun5i_timer_interrupt(int irq, void
*dev_id)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static struct irqaction sun5i_timer_irq = {
- .name = "sun5i_timer0",
- .flags = IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL,
- .handler = sun5i_timer_interrupt,
- .dev_id = &sun5i_clockevent,
-};
-
static u64 sun5i_timer_sched_read(void)
{
return ~readl(timer_base + TIMER_CNTVAL_LO_REG(1));
@@ -178,7 +171,8 @@ static void __init sun5i_timer_init(struct device_node
*node)
ticks_per_jiffy = DIV_ROUND_UP(rate, HZ);
- ret = setup_irq(irq, &sun5i_timer_irq);
+ ret = request_irq(irq, sun5i_timer_interrupt, IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL,
+ "sun5i_timer", &sun5i_clockevent);
Is the timer name change done in purpose ?
if (ret)
pr_warn("failed to setup irq %d\n", irq);
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
