On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:39:44PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > ACK! Thanks.
> Perhaps you can also find a beter name for __save_init_fpu/etc ;) The > name clearly suggests that it does "save + init" while in fact it does > "save and may be destroy FPU state". At least for the callers, the fact > that "destroy" is actually "init" doesn't really matter. > > But lets not rename it right now. This can conflict with the fixes we > need to do first. Right, so I think we should do fixes/cleanups first so that we can lose all the fat/cruft this code has grown. I'll make looking at that code easier later. I'll push out everything I have collected so far for people to see after I've finished bisecting another tip/master regression from today. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/