> @@ -1153,9 +1153,7 @@ static void ib_sa_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
>  {
>       struct ib_sa_device *sa_dev;
>       int s, e, i;
> -
> -     if (rdma_node_get_transport(device->node_type) != RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB)
> -             return;
> +     int count = 0;
> 
>       if (device->node_type == RDMA_NODE_IB_SWITCH)
>               s = e = 0;
> @@ -1175,7 +1173,7 @@ static void ib_sa_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
> 
>       for (i = 0; i <= e - s; ++i) {
>               spin_lock_init(&sa_dev->port[i].ah_lock);
> -             if (rdma_port_get_link_layer(device, i + 1) !=
> IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND)
> +             if (!rdma_tech_ib(device, i + 1))

Note for someone who cares.  This patch didn't introduce this problem, but I 
think the port number should be "i + s".

Reply via email to