On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@suse.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
>> Given that, I would say that merely shoving firmware files through the
>> module verifier as-is would not be okay.
>
> Replacing one dog and pony show for another is what is going on, what
> you describe and suggest seems best, and I welcome patches, it seems
> you know what you are talking about :)
>

Don't hold your breath.  My plate is over-full.  I'm probably a decent
reviewer of crypto, though.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to