On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:41:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@do-not-panic.com> wrote: > > > + gbe_mem = devm_ioremap_wc(&p_dev->dev, gbe_mem_phys, > > + gbe_mem_size); > > > + gbe_mem = dma_alloc_writecombine(NULL, gbe_mem_size, > > + &gbe_dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL); > > > + par->wc_cookie = arch_phys_wc_add(gbe_mem_phys, gbe_mem_size); > > > + arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie); > > > + arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie); > > Could we _please_ rename dma_*_writecombine() to dma_*_wc(), so that the > naming is > coherent across the various APIs?
Sure, OK done. Will send once this series is merged and visible on linux-next. But who's tree should this go through? Since it depends on this series which goes through Tomi's tree should it go through there? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
