* Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:41:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > + gbe_mem = devm_ioremap_wc(&p_dev->dev, gbe_mem_phys,
> > > + gbe_mem_size);
> >
> > > + gbe_mem = dma_alloc_writecombine(NULL, gbe_mem_size,
> > > + &gbe_dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > > + par->wc_cookie = arch_phys_wc_add(gbe_mem_phys, gbe_mem_size);
> >
> > > + arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie);
> >
> > > + arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie);
> >
> > Could we _please_ rename dma_*_writecombine() to dma_*_wc(), so that the
> > naming is
> > coherent across the various APIs?
>
> Sure, OK done. Will send once this series is merged and visible on
> linux-next.
> But who's tree should this go through? Since it depends on this series which
> goes through Tomi's tree should it go through there?
So we could do the rename near the end of the merge window, when all the
patches
have drained from maintainer trees into Linus's tree. Mind keeping it in your
tree
until then?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
