On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:30:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > I'd be interested in the comments of others, though, to see if there is > any reservation about the hstate size breakdown. It may actually find no > current customer who is interested in parsing it. (If we keep it, I would > suggest the 'x' change to '*' similar to per-order breakdowns in > show_mem()). It may also be possible to add it later if a definitive > usecase is presented.
I have no interest in parsing the size breakdown today. I might change my mind tomorrow and having the extra information hurts very little, so I won't argue against it either. > But overall I'm very happy with the new addition and think it's a good > solution to the problem. Agreed. Thank you! Jörn -- One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision. -- Bertrand Russell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
