On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, David Rientjes wrote: > I'm happy with this and thanks very much for going the extra mile and > breaking the usage down by hstate size. > > I'd be interested in the comments of others, though, to see if there is > any reservation about the hstate size breakdown. It may actually find no > current customer who is interested in parsing it. (If we keep it, I would > suggest the 'x' change to '*' similar to per-order breakdowns in > show_mem()). It may also be possible to add it later if a definitive > usecase is presented. > > But overall I'm very happy with the new addition and think it's a good > solution to the problem. >
No objections from anybody else, so Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> Thanks Naoya! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
