On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:30 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> There is only a single PREEMPT_ACTIVE use in the regular __schedule() > path and that is to circumvent the task->state check. Since the code > setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE is the immediate caller of __schedule() we can > replace this with a function argument. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > --- Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
