We just made sure policy->cpu is online and this check will always fail
as the policy is active. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skan...@codeaurora.org>
---
Resending as a separate patch.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 58aabe0f2d2c..4fa2215cc6ec 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -843,18 +843,11 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct
attribute *attr,
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- /* Updating inactive policies is invalid, so avoid doing that. */
- if (unlikely(policy_is_inactive(policy))) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto unlock_policy_rwsem;
- }
-
if (fattr->store)
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
else
ret = -EIO;
-unlock_policy_rwsem:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
unlock:
put_online_cpus();
--
2.4.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
