linux-lvm  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] gcc: change zero-sized array to fexlible array [email protected]
• [linux-lvm] [PATCH] lvdisplay: dispaly partial when underlying devs missing Zhao Heming
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] lvdisplay: dispaly partial when underlying devs missing [email protected]
• [linux-lvm] extend raid5 - how if possible? lejeczek
  • Re: [linux-lvm] extend raid5 - how if possible? Heinz Mauelshagen
  • Re: [linux-lvm] extend raid5 - how if possible? Christopher Jacoby
• [linux-lvm] [PATCH] tests: use correct RA size, underly dev & delay time. Zhao Heming
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] tests: use correct RA size, underly dev & delay time. [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH] tests: use correct RA size, underly dev & delay time. Zdenek Kabelac
• [linux-lvm] what will happen with lvconvert merge after reboot? Tomas Dalebjörk
  • [linux-lvm] how often does lvm team update source code in ftp site [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] how often does lvm team update source code in ftp site Marian Csontos
  • Re: [linux-lvm] how often does lvm team update source code in ftp site [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] how often does lvm team update source code in ftp site Frank Ch. Eigler
  • Re: [linux-lvm] what will happen with lvconvert merge after reboot? Zdenek Kabelac
• [linux-lvm] What do these messages mean? Orion Poplawski
  • Re: [linux-lvm] What do these messages mean? David Teigland
• [linux-lvm] lvm question regarding start and placement of data L A Walsh
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm question regarding start and placement of data Alasdair G Kergon
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm question regarding start and placement of data L A Walsh
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm question regarding start and placement of data Alasdair G Kergon
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm question regarding start and placement of data L A Walsh
• [linux-lvm] Suggestion: lvm2 filters lib needs to show some readable info for end user [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Suggestion: lvm2 filters lib needs to show some readable info for end user David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Suggestion: lvm2 filters lib needs to show some readable info for end user [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Suggestion: lvm2 filters lib needs to show some readable info for end user [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Suggestion: lvm2 filters lib needs to show some readable info for end user David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Suggestion: lvm2 filters lib needs to show some readable info for end user [email protected]
• [linux-lvm] Failed to update old PV extension headers in VG Henk Kraal
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Failed to update old PV extension headers in VG David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Failed to update old PV extension headers in VG Henk Kraal
• [linux-lvm] RAID-less parity? Janne Heß
  • Re: [linux-lvm] RAID-less parity? Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] RAID-less parity? David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] RAID-less parity? Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] RAID-less parity? Janne Heß
• [linux-lvm] in lvm Shell --reportformat json is ignored Oliver Rath
• [linux-lvm] About online pvmove/lvresize on shared VG Gang He
  • Re: [linux-lvm] About online pvmove/lvresize on shared VG David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] About online pvmove/lvresize on shared VG Gang He
  • Re: [linux-lvm] About online pvmove/lvresize on shared VG David Teigland
• [linux-lvm] Difference between thin_ll_xxx & thin_xxx lampahome
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Difference between thin_ll_xxx & thin_xxx Ming-Hung Tsai
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Difference between thin_ll_xxx & thin_xxx lampahome
• [linux-lvm] Feature request: support for editline Bastian Germann
• Re: [linux-lvm] [dm-crypt] LuksOpen hangs ? Ondrej Kozina
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [dm-crypt] LuksOpen hangs ? B&A Consultants
• [linux-lvm] Removing VG mappings using dmsetup tool Vojtech Juranek
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Removing VG mappings using dmsetup tool Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Removing VG mappings using dmsetup tool Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Removing VG mappings using dmsetup tool Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Removing VG mappings using dmsetup tool Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Removing VG mappings using dmsetup tool Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Removing VG mappings using dmsetup tool Vojtech Juranek
• [linux-lvm] [PATCH] Change dev->bcache_fd default value from 0 to -1 Zhao Heming
• [linux-lvm] How to repair superblock is corrupt lampahome
  • Re: [linux-lvm] How to repair superblock is corrupt Gionatan Danti
• [linux-lvm] question about vg underlying pv devs order [email protected]
• [linux-lvm] issue (or bug): when vgremove does removing lvmcache [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] issue (or bug): when vgremove does removing lvmcache David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] issue (or bug): when vgremove does removing lvmcache [email protected]
• [linux-lvm] [lvmlockd] sanlock stuck while getting VGLK Damon Wang
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [lvmlockd] sanlock stuck while getting VGLK David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [lvmlockd] sanlock stuck while getting VGLK Damon Wang
• Re: [linux-lvm] [general question] rare silent data corruption when writing data Michal Soltys
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [general question] rare silent data corruption when writing data John Stoffel
• [linux-lvm] lvmcache comes back dirty after unclean shutdown Paul Richards
• [linux-lvm] can we change cluster_ringid_seq in libdlm from uint32_t to uint64_t? Gang He
  • Re: [linux-lvm] can we change cluster_ringid_seq in libdlm from uint32_t to uint64_t? David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] can we change cluster_ringid_seq in libdlm from uint32_t to uint64_t? Gang He
• [linux-lvm] udev/10-dm.rules.in: unexpectedly skipping device? Michael Stapelberg
  • Re: [linux-lvm] udev/10-dm.rules.in: unexpectedly skipping device? Peter Rajnoha
  • Re: [linux-lvm] udev/10-dm.rules.in: unexpectedly skipping device? Michael Stapelberg
• [linux-lvm] [1019133-4yqc8ex4] LVM hangs after volume change Shock Media B.V. support
  • Re: [linux-lvm] [1019133-4yqc8ex4] LVM hangs after volume change Stuart D Gathman
• [linux-lvm] lvcreate: adding devices causes an alignment inconsistencies Bernhard Sulzer
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvcreate: adding devices causes an alignment inconsistencies Heinz Mauelshagen
• [linux-lvm] storage-logger: Recording changes to the udev database Alasdair G Kergon
  • Re: [linux-lvm] storage-logger: Recording changes to the udev database Brian McCullough
  • Re: [linux-lvm] storage-logger: Recording changes to the udev database Brian McCullough
  • Re: [linux-lvm] storage-logger: Recording changes to the udev database Alasdair G Kergon
  • Re: [linux-lvm] storage-logger: Recording changes to the udev database Brian McCullough
• [linux-lvm] Q: lvcreate, systemd and tmp.mount pasxizeis
• [linux-lvm] lvm raid5 : drives all present but vg/lvm will not assemble Andrew Falgout
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm raid5 : drives all present but vg/lvm will not assemble Bernd Eckenfels
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm raid5 : drives all present but vg/lvm will not assemble Roger Heflin
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm raid5 : drives all present but vg/lvm will not assemble Andrew Falgout
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm raid5 : drives all present but vg/lvm will not assemble Andrew Falgout
• [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Scott Mcdermott
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Joe Thornber
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots John Stoffel
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Scott Mcdermott
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] when bringing dm-cache online, consumes all memory and reboots Scott Mcdermott
• [linux-lvm] Do we have a way to clone the customer lvm2 environment? Gang He
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Do we have a way to clone the customer lvm2 environment? Zdenek Kabelac
• [linux-lvm] probable lvm thin_pool exhaustion maiski
  • Re: [linux-lvm] probable lvm thin_pool exhaustion Marian Csontos
  • [linux-lvm] probable lvm thin_pool exhaustion maiski
  • Re: [linux-lvm] probable lvm thin_pool exhaustion Ming-Hung Tsai
• [linux-lvm] lvm+ sanlock snapshot issue Andrea Leofreddi
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvm+ sanlock snapshot issue David Teigland
• [linux-lvm] stable-2.02 missing patch files for lib/device/bcache.c [email protected]
• [linux-lvm] faster snapshot creation? Eric Toombs
  • Re: [linux-lvm] faster snapshot creation? Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] faster snapshot creation? Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] faster snapshot creation? Eric Toombs
  • Re: [linux-lvm] faster snapshot creation? Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] faster snapshot creation? Douglas Paul
  • Re: [linux-lvm] faster snapshot creation? Stuart D. Gathman
• [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug David Teigland
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug [email protected]
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Chris Murphy
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] commit c527a0cbfc3 may have a bug Gionatan Danti
• [linux-lvm] pvmove --abort Matthias Leopold
  • Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove --abort Stuart D Gathman
  • Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove --abort Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove --abort Matthias Leopold
• [linux-lvm] [PATCH 0/2] JSON output for dmstats Todd Gill
  • [linux-lvm] [PATCH 1/2] Add JSON output support to dmstats for list and report subcommands Todd Gill
  • [linux-lvm] [PATCH 2/2] Update man page to include --reportformat for list and report subcommands Todd Gill
• [linux-lvm] Deeply impressed Michael Lipp
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Deeply impressed Mike Snitzer
• [linux-lvm] Failed merge, still running? Mauricio Tavares
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Failed merge, still running? Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Failed merge, still running? Mauricio Tavares
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Failed merge, still running? Stuart D. Gathman
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Failed merge, still running? Mauricio Tavares
• [linux-lvm] Time needed for take a snapshot Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Time needed for take a snapshot Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Time needed for take a snapshot Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Time needed for take a snapshot Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Time needed for take a snapshot Gionatan Danti
• [linux-lvm] [PATCH] [vgreduce] add suggestion message for mirror LVs Heming Zhao
• [linux-lvm] [PATCH] [test] fix corosync.conf: no interface error Heming Zhao
• [linux-lvm] lvreduce thin-pool Paul Dann
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvreduce thin-pool Zdenek Kabelac
• [linux-lvm] lvmcache on non-lvm source? Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvmcache on non-lvm source? Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] lvmcache on non-lvm source? Gionatan Danti
• [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Marian Csontos
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Gionatan Danti
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] metadata device too small Gionatan Danti
• [linux-lvm] bashism in tools/Makefile.in Christian Hesse
  • Re: [linux-lvm] bashism in tools/Makefile.in Zdenek Kabelac
  • [linux-lvm] [PATCH 1/1] build: force to use bash (was: Re: bashism in tools/Makefile.in) Christian Hesse
• [linux-lvm] thinpool metadata got way too large, how to handle? Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] thinpool metadata got way too large, how to handle? Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] thinpool metadata got way too large, how to handle? Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] thinpool metadata got way too large, how to handle? Ede Wolf
  • Re: [linux-lvm] thinpool metadata got way too large, how to handle? Zdenek Kabelac
• [linux-lvm] [PATCH] generator: fix file descriptor leak Topi Miettinen
• Re: [linux-lvm] linux-lvm Digest, Vol 190, Issue 6 Daniel Janzon
• [linux-lvm] It looks wrong for the timeout when lvm test running Heming Zhao
  • Re: [linux-lvm] It looks wrong for the timeout when lvm test running Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] It looks wrong for the timeout when lvm test running Heming Zhao
  • Re: [linux-lvm] It looks wrong for the timeout when lvm test running Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] It looks wrong for the timeout when lvm test running Heming Zhao
  • Re: [linux-lvm] It looks wrong for the timeout when lvm test running Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] It looks wrong for the timeout when lvm test running Heming Zhao
• [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Łukasz Czerpak
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Łukasz Czerpak
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Łukasz Czerpak
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Łukasz Czerpak
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Łukasz Czerpak
  • [linux-lvm] Thin pool vg1-thinpool1-tpool (253:3) transaction_id is 549, while expected 505. Łukasz Czerpak
• [linux-lvm] Question about vgreduce on raid lvm cache Heming Zhao
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Question about vgreduce on raid lvm cache Heming Zhao
• [linux-lvm] bcache now to become io-manager? John Stoffel
  • Re: [linux-lvm] bcache now to become io-manager? Marian Csontos
  • Re: [linux-lvm] bcache now to become io-manager? Joe Thornber
  • Re: [linux-lvm] bcache now to become io-manager? John Stoffel
  • Re: [linux-lvm] bcache now to become io-manager? Zdenek Kabelac
• [linux-lvm] Best way to run LVM over multiple SW RAIDs? Daniel Janzon
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Best way to run LVM over multiple SW RAIDs? Anatoly Pugachev
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Best way to run LVM over multiple SW RAIDs? Roberto Fastec

• Earlier messages
• Later messages