2018年7月10日(火) 6:23 Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reic...@collabora.co.uk>:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:14:43PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > static int ov772x_read(struct i2c_client *client, u8 addr)
> > > {
> > > - int ret;
> > > - u8 val;
> > > -
> > > - ret = i2c_master_send(client, &addr, 1);
> > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > - return ret;
> > > - ret = i2c_master_recv(client, &val, 1);
> > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > - return ret;
> > > -
> > > - return val;
> > > + return sccb_read_byte(client, addr);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline int ov772x_write(struct i2c_client *client, u8 addr, u8
> > > value)
> > > {
> > > - return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, addr, value);
> > > + return sccb_write_byte(client, addr, value);
> > > }
>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reic...@collabora.co.uk>
>
> > Minor nit: I'd rather drop these two functions and use the
> > sccb-accessors directly.
> >
> > However, I really like how this looks here: It is totally clear we are
> > doing SCCB and hide away all the details.
>
> I think it would be even better to introduce a SSCB regmap layer
> and use that.
I'm fine with introducing a SCCB regmap layer.
But do we need to provide both a SCCB regmap and these SCCB helpers?
If we have a regmap_init_sccb(), I feel these three SCCB helper functions
don't need to be exported anymore.
