On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:46:05 Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 00:07 Thu 21 Jan 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Brandon Philips wrote:
> > > On 19:50 Wed 20 Jan 2010, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >> On 01/20/2010 04:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > >>> As we're discussing about having a separate tree for v4l2-apps,
> > >>> maybe the better is to port it to -git (in a way that we can
> > >>> preserve the log history).
> > >
> > > I have a small script I used to convert the history of libv4l to
> > > git. Let me know when we are ready to drop them from the hg tree
> > > and I can do the conversion and post the result for review.
> > >
> > > This is the result from the script for just libv4l:
> > > http://ifup.org/git/?p=libv4l.git;a=summary
> >
> > Seems fine, but we need to import the entire v4l2-apps.
>
> Yes, I know. I will run the script over v4l2-apps to generate a git
> repo once v4l2-apps is ready to be dropped from v4l-dvb mercurial and
> we figure out the directory layout.
>
> Doing it before is just a waste of time since they will get out of
> sync.
>
> > > Also, I suggest we call the repo v4lutils? In the spirit of
> > > usbutils, pciutils, etc.
> >
> > Hmm... as dvb package is called as dvb-utils, it seems more logical to call
> > it
> > v4l2-utils, but v4l2utils would equally work.
>
> Yes, that is fine.
>
> > IMO, the better is to use v4l2 instead of just v4l, to avoid causing
> > any mess with the old v4l applications provided with xawtv.
>
> The problem I saw was that libv4l1 will be in v4l2-utils. I don't care
> either way though.
>
> So here is how I see v4l-utils.git being laid out based on what others
> have said:
>
> libv4l1/
> libv4l2/
> libv4lconvert/
> test/
> v4l2-dbg/
> contrib/
> qv4l2-qt3/
> qv4l2-qt4/
> cx25821/
> etc... everything else
Hmm. I think I would prefer to have a structure like this:
lib/
libv4l1/
libv4l2/
libv4lconvert/
utils/
v4l2-dbg
v4l2-ctl
cx18-ctl
ivtv-ctl
contrib/
test/
everything else
And everything in lib and utils can be packaged by distros, while contrib
is not packaged.
What would also be nice is if this project http://v4l-test.sourceforge.net/
could eventually be merged in v4l2-apps.
>
> Are there things in v4l2-apps that should be imported?
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what you mean.
Regards,
Hans
> Other suggestions?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brandon
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html