On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 08:34:29AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 11:30:41PM -0500, Richard Acayan wrote: > > A device tree compatible makes it possible for this driver to be used on > > Open Firmware devices. Initialization of power-managed resources such as > > the reset GPIO and voltage regulators can be specified in the device > > tree and handled by the driver. Add support for this so the Pixel 3a can > > use the driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <[email protected]> > > Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > > You did not receive such tag. You cannot construct tags, just because > of ... what exactly? Why do you think to use this or other email?
I interpret "NAK" as a request to stop working on the patch. I assumed you wanted this for process reasons, since I didn't specifically address your review of the reset sequence for 3 revisions (v2-v4). I can't go back and follow the submission process differently. Original complaint (https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]): I already told you this at v1 and you ignored the problem and never responded. NAK The path forward is usually to give up, or keep the NAK and hope that the other maintainers accept the patch anyway. I see 17 cases of the latter since the kernel started using Git until v6.19-rc1. > You received only NAK as disagreement of this patch, but I did not allow > to merge it with my NAK. Ok, I will remove the Nacked-by in the next revision unless you communicate that you actually want work on this patch to stop.
