Irfan,
> Would the above allow 192.168.1.191 and 192.168.1.192 to be valid host IPs
> ?. Then would require the following two routes.
>
> route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.192
> route add -net 192.168.1.64 netmask 255.255.255.192
> route add -net 192.168.1.128 netmask 255.255.255.128
This is where 191 and 192 will be, and yes they are valid host IP's.
For the last two lines of course you'd need to set a gw statement, the
first one would be local I presume ?
Because these three statements of course define the complete C-class
subnet.
kr=
\\\___///
\\ - - //
( @ @ )
+---------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo-------------+
| kris carlier - [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Hiroshima 45, Tsjernobyl 86, Windows 95 |
| Linux, the choice of a GNU gener8ion |
| SMS: +32-75-61.43.05 |
+------------------------Oooo-------------+
oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
