Unless the bridge software can encapsulate the traffic into an IP packet, bridging
isn't an option for me...
Barry
Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > I know that VMS Clustering and LAT are time sensitive protocols, but has
> > > any work been completed to support IP tunneling of DECnet, Clustering
> > > and/or LAT?
> >
> > Digitcompaqital still refuse to release LAT specifications
>
> Bridge 'em! Last I knew, Digital was bridging LAT over some of their
> internal links, even satellite links, with reasonable success. The timing
> windows are on the order of tens of seconds, though of course performance
> will become agonizing with delays far short of those that would break the
> connection.
>
> It would be nice to see Compaq Digital either publish the LAT spec.s or
> act as though they intend to really market it some day. Ditto LAD/LAST,
> which never gave me one tenth the headaches of CD*Net or LanCD.
>
> --
> Mark H. Wood, radical centrist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Charlie, put down that Glitter Glue -- it's time to show the audience
> some content!
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
