You might also want to try the new samba 2.0.5a.
Tuan
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
> Yes it is, I already checked that. Thanks for the reply though.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tuan Hoang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 4, 1999 3:42 AM
> To: Trenton D. Adams
> Cc: Linux-Net
> Subject: Re: Samba Not showing in network
>
> Hi Trenton,
>
> Is your ethernet configured properly with the right broadcast address and
> netmask? Can you give an snapshot of your "ifconfig" and "netstat -rn"?
> Also the /etc/smb.conf might be helpful.
>
> later,
> Tuan
>
> On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
>
> > I have Red Hat Linux 6.0, and Windows 98 Second Edition. I can't see the
> > samba server, what can I possibly check?
> >
> > Here are a few details that may be relevant.
> >
> > I am running dhcpd with the following configuration
> > My internet DNS servers (should I setup a LAN DNS?)
> > Gateway = 192.168.0.1
> > Subnet Mask = 255.255.255.0
> > DHCP Server = 192.168.0.1
> > No Wins server
> >
> >
> > I am running smbd and nmbd.
> >
> > I just looked at the nmbd log, and it says that Packet send failed to
> > 192.168.0.255. I believe nmbd was trying to tell my network that the
> linux
> > box was there, and what it's name was (???).
> >
> > I did an Upgrade to Linux 6.0. Is it possible that the upgrade didn't
> > upgrade nmb, and smb properly?
> >
> > I can't think of anything else that may be relevant at the moment.
> > p.s.
> > I have never ever gotten samba to show on the network on any linux machine
> > before!
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]