Is this a WinModem? I thought that the newer Vaios had "real" modems.
(%!$@%!@$!@$!%!!!)
---Raymond
Alex Belits wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Raymond Blum wrote:
>
> > I have linux running on my Vaio N505VE and it looks great! Problem is I
> > now want to take it online and am having problems with the built-in
> > modem. According to Windoze, the modem is com2 (IRQ 3, 0x2f8). When I
> > made a link from /dev/modem to /dev/ttyS1, setserial then gives me the
> > following:
> >
> > /dev/modem, Line 1, UART: unknown, Port: 0x02f8, IRQ: 3
> > Baud_base: 115200, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
> > closing_wait: 3000, closing_wait2: infinte
> > Flags: spd_normal skip_test
> >
> > which seems correct, when I then use minicom, it immediately reports my
> > session status as "online" and kde's PPP utility says that "the modem is
> > busy"
> >
> > In minicom I have tried using both hardware flow control and XONXOFF,
> > with no effect.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> Abandon all hope -- it's Rockwell HCF modem. If cat /proc/pci returns
> something like
>
> Bus 0, device 11, function 0:
> Communication controller: Unknown vendor Unknown device (rev 1).
> Vendor id=127a. Device id=2005.
> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 3. Master Capable. Latency=64.
> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xfede0000 [0xfede0000].
> I/O at 0xfc78 [0xfc79].
>
> you have the same thing as what I've got with N505VX (and not a normal
> modem that was on N505TX).
>
> --
> Alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
