>>>>> "Alexey" == kuznet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexey> Hello! >> There is no point in using it for transmit since the Linux TCP >> stack currently doesn't support this. Alexey> Hmm... Are you sure? Until now I thought exaclty the same with Alexey> opposite sign. 8) Namely: there are no reasons to awake the Alexey> feature in TCP, because no drivers support this. Well in order to use it and really gain on it for transmit, you want scatter/gather skbuffs, something which I really want to look at (provided I can find the time). If you are doing the data copy anyway, there checksum is almost free. Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Ted Matsumura
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Anton Ivanov
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Anton Ivanov
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Christopher E. Brown
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Ralf Baechle
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks kuznet
- RE: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- RE: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Ted Matsumura
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Pete Wyckoff
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Zachary Amsden
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Alan Cox
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Bjorn Wesen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Zachary Amsden
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Ion Badulescu
