On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:55:20AM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Functionally, a Linux box with a gig card, 802.1q and connected to a > switch, makes a *VERY* inexpensive and featurful multiport router. Though, > I have no idea how it performs. Of course it will be slower then the > hardware based solutions. Alot of hardware based solutions loose big time as soon as you enable certain features which cannot be handled in hardware. Hasta la vista, performance. Ralf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks David S. Miller
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Rick Blake
- RE: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Ted Matsumura
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Anton Ivanov
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Anton Ivanov
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Christopher E. Brown
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Ralf Baechle
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks kuznet
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- RE: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Ted Matsumura
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Pete Wyckoff
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Zachary Amsden
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Jes Sorensen
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Alan Cox
- Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks Bjorn Wesen
