Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks

[Jes Sorensen]

>>>>> "Anton" == Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>>  I still haven't figure out what I need 802.1Q for, but maybe thats
>> just me. Guess I ought to go read the standard.

Anton> The main problem with current router based 802.1Q
Anton> implementations is that the firewalling, accounting and QoS for
Anton> GigE capable equipment case have to be expressed: quoting you
Anton> "is still by using words that are not suited to be put in
Anton> print".

Hmmm now you are using rude words. QoS is one of those things I just
don't believe in, buy a fatter pipe, it's cheaper in the long term.

Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]