Javier Castillo wrote:
> > > > > I read that linux 2.2 can do automatix proxy arp, so if I have two
> > > > > interfaces in my linux box:
> > > > >
> > > > > eth0: 192.168.0.1/16
> > > > > eth1: 192.168.1.1/24
> > > > >
> > > > > if for example, 192.168.0.25(a windows which is configurated with a
> > > > > 16bits netmask) tries to ping to
> > > > > 192.168.1.10, my linux box will reply to arp request from my windows??.
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > >
> > > If so, why my linux box does not answer that arp request.
> > >
> > > Do I have to setup some "/proc/sys/net...." before??. I did think that
> > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/all/proxy_arp = 1 was enought :(
> >
> > For me, it was.
> >
> > What do "ifconfig" and "route -n" show?
[snipped]
I can't see anything obviously wrong there. My first suspicion would
be that it's the overlapping netblocks that are causing the problem
(192.168.1.1/24 is a subset of 192.168.0.1/16).
Reconfiguring your subnets so that they don't overlap might fix it; it
could also avoid problems in the future.
--
Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
