> Glynn Clements wrote:
>> > > > > I read that linux 2.2 can do automatix proxy arp, so if I have two
>> > > > > interfaces in my linux box:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > eth0: 192.168.0.1/16
>> > > > > eth1: 192.168.1.1/24
>> > > > >
[...]
> I can't see anything obviously wrong there. My first suspicion would
> be that it's the overlapping netblocks that are causing the problem
> (192.168.1.1/24 is a subset of 192.168.0.1/16).
>
> Reconfiguring your subnets so that they don't overlap might fix it; it
> could also avoid problems in the future.
I have used that kind of setup on AIX and NT machines before (overlapping
netblocks, I can't help on the ARP issues). The most specific route is
supposed to be seleted. I would be really disapointed if Linux didn't
support it. From RFC 1812, it looks like it should be supported too :
section 2.2.5.2 Classless Inter Domain Routing (CIDR).
They talk about continuous 1 bits tough, to find what route is most
specific. I'd be using the _total_ number of 1 bits, allowing holes
in the netmask. But that's just me.
--
Francois Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
