According to Ray Olszewski: While burning my CPU.
>
>
> I don't know the capabilities of Outlook, but can you either sort on To: OR
> Cc: "linux-newbie" without the rest of the address, OR on the Sender: header
> (which always seems to be "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")?Either
> should serve you, based on what I notice about message headers.
I would agree with Ray, however just a comment.
Joseph Spacone wrote "TO:Linux-newbie" and "CC:Linux-newbie" that is
possably his problem "linux-newbie" would be more appropriate i would
imagen, +, its Cc: not CC: and To not TO, as Ray wrote above.
As far as i can see there is not much differenace (if any), with headers
from this group as any other.
>
> At 02:46 AM 2/22/99 -0800, Joseph Spacone wrote:
> >I am really having a problem here....I have several different accounts and
> >"in-box" folders set up, and I have applied various rules to them so that
> >the incoming mail gets sorted to the proper folder. The problem that I'm
> >having though is that this list does not seem to conform to any
> >rule....sometimes the postings (like this one) are sent directly
> >TO:Linux-newbie@ etc, sometimes they are posted to the recipients address
> >with a CC:Linux-newbie@ etc..and I just received a posting that did not meet
> >EITHER of those two criteria. I have rules set up to handle the TO and the
> >CC, but if the posting doesn't meet either of those, then I have no idea
> >what to do. What's going on here? Is there no conformity on this list, or
> >am I doing something wrong? I am using Outlook Express and Win98.
>
> ------------------------------------"Never tell me the odds!"---
> Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo
> 762 Garland Drive
> Palo Alto, CA 94303-3603
> 650.321.3561 voice 650.322.1209 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
