What's the ORBS database? How does one find it?
Ray Olszewski wrote:
> My original attempt to post this message failed. Apparently my new ISP
> (pacbell.net) is in the ORBS database as an open relay, and apparently vger
> now uses the ORBS database to screen incoming mail. I'm using a VERY
> temporary workaround to try to get this message through, but until this
> problem gets solved somehow -- and the cost of changing ISPs is too great
> for me to solve it that way -- I'll have to bid you a (temporary) goodbye.
>
> Are others of you who use pacbell.net experiencing similar problems (new as
> of Sunday morning, in my case)?
>
> >Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON
> >Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 12:04:20 -0800 (PST)
> >From: Internet Mail Delivery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
> >
> > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 12:05:02 -0800
> > From: Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Sergio (Serge) Rey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Linux Newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Disk thrashing, how to diagnose, fix
> >
> >Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
> >
> > Recipient address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Reason: Message rejected; bad initial status.
> > Diagnostic code: smtp; 553-Open relay - see
> http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=206.13.28.123 If you feel we mistreat
> you, do contact us. Ask HELP for our contact information.
> > Remote system: dns; vger.rutgers.edu
> (TCP|206.13.28.123|64370|128.6.190.2|25) (Open relay - see
> http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=206.13.28.123) (If you feel we
> mistreat you, do contact us.) (Ask HELP for our contact information.)
> >
> >Original-envelope-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Reporting-MTA: dns; mta2.snfc21.pbi.net
> >
> >Action: failed
> >Status: 5.0.0 (Message rejected; bad initial status.)
> >Original-recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Final-recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Remote-MTA: dns; vger.rutgers.edu (TCP|206.13.28.123|64370|128.6.190.2|25)
> > (Open relay - see http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=206.13.28.123)
> > (If you feel we mistreat you, do contact us.)
> > (Ask HELP for our contact information.)
> >Diagnostic-code: smtp; 553-Open relay - see
> > http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=206.13.28.123 If you feel we mistreat
> > you, do contact us. Ask HELP for our contact information.
> >Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Received: from tcp-daemon by mta2.snfc21.pbi.net
> > (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8)
> > id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (original mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 12:04:20 -0800 (PST)
> >Received: from celine.comarre.com ([63.198.182.124])
> > by mta2.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8)
> > with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 12:03:31 -0800 (PST)
> >Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=kuryakin.comarre.com)
> > by celine.comarre.com with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1 (Debian))
> > id 127OYl-0001hM-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2000 12:03:31 -0800
> >Received: from [192.168.1.6] (helo=rayolsz.vip.best.com)
> > by kuryakin.comarre.com with smtp (Exim 3.11 #1 (Debian))
> > id 127OYk-0001yB-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2000 12:03:30 -0800
> >Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 12:05:02 -0800
> >From: Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Disk thrashing, how to diagnose, fix
> >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: "Sergio (Serge) Rey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Linux Newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >MIME-version: 1.0
> >X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
> >Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> >The first thought that comes to mind is that, when running Gnome, your
> >system is making more use of swap space than otherwise. How much memory does
> >your system have in it? If you run "free" before and after starting Gnome,
> >how does the reported use of swap space change? Most basic, is the system
> >sufficiently slow to make plausible the idea that it is using swap space
> >heavily?
> >
> >At 11:01 AM 1/9/00 -0800, Sergio (Serge) Rey wrote:
> >>
> >>I notice a difference in disk utilization between running at the console
> >>and running under Gnome. Under the console the disk light comes on about
> >>once every 2 minutes or so, while under Gnome, this happens more
> >>frequently say every 5-15 seconds. I don't notice any performance slowdown
> >>running apps under Gnome, but I'm wondering if this increased disk
> >>utilization is something that I should fix (i.e., is it a problem) or is
> >>it normal?
> >
> >------------------------------------"Never tell me the odds!"---
> >Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo
> >Palo Alto, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------"Never tell me the odds!"---
> Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo
> Palo Alto, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
--
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Roland
President
Roland Internet Services
Standard & Custom Web/Email Hosting Solutions
** Ask us about Frontpage 98 Server Extensions!
-----------------------------------------------
