From: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Sorry, the previous patch was a copy/paste mistake, this one should be
better]

I have no access to the docs for this chip but I'm pretty sure the current
address of the two DIDR1 registers is wrong because it's outside the
TUSB-specific register space.  The modified address in turn has a good
chance to be correct.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h
index bb25c3b..f2036ef 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h
@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ extern void tusb_allow_idle(struct musb *musb, u32 
wakeup_enables);
 #define TUSB_PROD_TEST_RESET_VAL               0xa596
 #define TUSB_EP_FIFO(ep)                       (TUSB_FIFO_BASE + (ep) * 0x20)
 
-#define TUSB_DIDR1_LO                          0x1f8
-#define TUSB_DIDR1_HI                          0x1fc
+#define TUSB_DIDR1_LO                          (TUSB_SYS_REG_BASE + 0x1f8)
+#define TUSB_DIDR1_HI                          (TUSB_SYS_REG_BASE + 0x1fc)
 #define                TUSB_DIDR1_HI_CHIP_REV(v)               (((v) >> 17) & 
0xf)
 #define                        TUSB_DIDR1_HI_REV_20            0
 #define                        TUSB_DIDR1_HI_REV_30            1
-- 
1.5.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to