* Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080329 18:48]: > From: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [Sorry, the previous patch was a copy/paste mistake, this one should be > better] > > I have no access to the docs for this chip but I'm pretty sure the current > address of the two DIDR1 registers is wrong because it's outside the > TUSB-specific register space. The modified address in turn has a good > chance to be correct. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h > index bb25c3b..f2036ef 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h > @@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ extern void tusb_allow_idle(struct musb *musb, u32 > wakeup_enables); > #define TUSB_PROD_TEST_RESET_VAL 0xa596 > #define TUSB_EP_FIFO(ep) (TUSB_FIFO_BASE + (ep) * 0x20) > > -#define TUSB_DIDR1_LO 0x1f8 > -#define TUSB_DIDR1_HI 0x1fc > +#define TUSB_DIDR1_LO (TUSB_SYS_REG_BASE + > 0x1f8) > +#define TUSB_DIDR1_HI (TUSB_SYS_REG_BASE + > 0x1fc) > #define TUSB_DIDR1_HI_CHIP_REV(v) (((v) >> 17) & > 0xf) > #define TUSB_DIDR1_HI_REV_20 0 > #define TUSB_DIDR1_HI_REV_30 1
This looks like a valid fix. Hmm, I guess we've had some unnecessary software workarounds for tusb3.1 chips happening :) Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
