On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080329 18:48]: > > From: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > [Sorry, the previous patch was a copy/paste mistake, this one should be > > better] > > > > I have no access to the docs for this chip but I'm pretty sure the current > > address of the two DIDR1 registers is wrong because it's outside the > > TUSB-specific register space. The modified address in turn has a good > > chance to be correct. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h | 4 ++-- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h > > index bb25c3b..f2036ef 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.h > > @@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ extern void tusb_allow_idle(struct musb *musb, u32 > > wakeup_enables); > > #define TUSB_PROD_TEST_RESET_VAL 0xa596 > > #define TUSB_EP_FIFO(ep) (TUSB_FIFO_BASE + (ep) * 0x20) > > > > -#define TUSB_DIDR1_LO 0x1f8 > > -#define TUSB_DIDR1_HI 0x1fc > > +#define TUSB_DIDR1_LO (TUSB_SYS_REG_BASE + > > 0x1f8) > > +#define TUSB_DIDR1_HI (TUSB_SYS_REG_BASE + > > 0x1fc) > > #define TUSB_DIDR1_HI_CHIP_REV(v) (((v) >> 17) & > > 0xf) > > #define TUSB_DIDR1_HI_REV_20 0 > > #define TUSB_DIDR1_HI_REV_30 1 > > This looks like a valid fix. Hmm, I guess we've had some unnecessary > software workarounds for tusb3.1 chips happening :)
Ugh, I'm out for today and tomorrow but I'll test on wednesday and make sure it works. thanks, btw. -- Best Regards, Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.felipebalbi.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
