> Ah, sorry for the puns and any confusion.  I am talking about 2GB+
> file sizes, not memory.  The also proves my point - we now have >4GB
> memory on 32 bit systems - which is only applicable for a VERY small
> percentage of Linux users, but not >2GB files on 32 bit systems (once
> again - even though many other 32 bit OSes have them)... Jason

My understanding is that the bigmem patches are FS patches not memory
patches - they are inappropriately named perhaps.

maybe I'm off.

-sv

Reply via email to