> Ah, sorry for the puns and any confusion. I am talking about 2GB+ > file sizes, not memory. The also proves my point - we now have >4GB > memory on 32 bit systems - which is only applicable for a VERY small > percentage of Linux users, but not >2GB files on 32 bit systems (once > again - even though many other 32 bit OSes have them)... Jason My understanding is that the bigmem patches are FS patches not memory patches - they are inappropriately named perhaps. maybe I'm off. -sv
- Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Jason Titus
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Marc Mutz
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Stephen Waters
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Marc Mutz
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Stephen Waters
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Jason Titus
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Seth Vidal
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Jason Titus
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Seth Vidal
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Marc Mutz
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Jason Titus
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Seth Vidal
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Andre Pang
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Hunter Matthews
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Theo Van Dinter
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Adam J. Richter
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Adam J. Richter
- RE: Large files 2GB+ & RAID? Cavanaugh, Craig